Skip to main content

Thoughts on the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

 The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) is a group I have followed for a number of years and recently have grown tired of their useless rhetoric, talking points and their complete inability to weigh trade-offs when it comes to taxes. Maybe the organization has changed over the years. Maybe it was always like this and I never noticed until certain issues have come up.

Carbon Tax

The issue that sort of gets me the most is their position on the carbon tax. They're no carbon tax, but in a contextless way. I've gone into this in detail on my thoughts on climate change. I've thought of a pretty good analogy on this part to describe how I view them.

Suppose an organization is against the war in Afghanistan. No matter what, they just shout 'no war'. They'll use any rhetoric they can to say that 'no war for oil', 'no war for Halliburton' or whatever. The issue I have is that this organization cryptically holding back a specific ideological intention. Let's say this organization is an ideological pacifist. So they believe in no violence, not even for self-defense. One thing is an organization saying 'I'm against all war and all violence" rather than "I'm against THIS war." This organization that cloaks such an intention end up morally cornering themselves in odd ways. What I mean by that is say we're in a political climate that most people and parties support the war in Afghanistan and we're going to war. This organization will not only be against it, but they'll also be against funding for resources and equipment for our troops. Even though our troops are already on the battlefield, they're still getting undermined.

If I were against the war, I'd make that clear - but if the troops are off in the battlefield I want them to have the best resources possible.

This is where I see the CTF at this time. It always screams 'no carbon tax', but that isn't enough. If the CTF is against fighting climate change, cool. That's a position where everyone can understand. But they play the position of being against the tax only. They quasi hold fighting climate change, provide no positive solution. What we find in a country with a political climate where all major parties want to fight climate change and meet the Paris targets, that we're not getting to the best solution.

And what I see is they're fighting the carbon tax in away that will see a much larger and more costly regulatory regime put in place.

Millennial/Trolling Style of Conversation

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Island of Bryan Solar Panel Numbers are Horribly Misleading

Who doesn't want to be all sustainable and oh so environmentally friendly? I was watching the show and they brought down their 'friend' to help them get some solar panels on their resort. By friend, they mean some strategic business partnership to advertise the business, but that's not what I'm here to talk about - even though if this was an oil company 'friend' then all the numbers would be instantly scrutinized by default. Not in this case. And it just annoys me at how sloppy, misleading and downright fraudulent the way the solar crew present numbers. Here's how things were presented on the show: This is an island in the Bahamas which uses a diesel generator for electricity.  Diesel is dirty. The cost of this electricity is 35 cents/kWh. Solar is only 5 cents/kWh. Solar is obviously clean. Pays itself back in three years. When things are presented like this it only make sense to do solar right? It's drastically cheaper. It's cleaner. It's j

The West is Weak: Russia Invades Ukraine

 I haven't been writing a lot lately on this blog, but I felt the need to sign in and write about this. I've found myself feeling a bit depressed about the invasion of Ukraine - not because it happened, but due to how the west will predictably react to it. There will be a lot of talk, strong words, and even stronger rhetoric, but when the actual words become policy - it will be pathetically weak. There are people out there that seem to think or at least try to force the narrative of a simple dichotomy: either we accept Putin is doing it or it's WW3. Any normal person would find the choices here to be nauseating either way. If history is to serve a lesson, the first option often leads to the second option. But this dichotomy really illustrates the parameter that most people don't pick up on. The West is Morally Weak The facts are on the ground. The United States has the largest armed forces in human existence. A coalition of western powers is devastatingly more powerful

Milquetoast Brian Jean

  I've been following the UCP leader campaign here in Alberta with great interest. There has been a very anti-Kenney sentiment in the air around here, in particular with Kenney's top down party style, the lack of pushing back at Ottawa and over COVID restrictions/vaccine passports.  Brian Jean lost to Kenney and it looks like he lost because he was politically outmaneuvered - rather than a battle of ideas. He's obviously sour and was on the anti-Kenney train ever since. Let's just say that I was a bit excited that he's back. I wanted to see what he had to prove and that he may have some fire in him. The problem I have had with conservatives as of late is them being milquetoast. All that means is that they're very safe, very center and literally bring nothing to the table. Even though conservatives in CANADA say there are many things that need to change, they don't actually do anything all that different than the governing left. Maybe not as bad, but it all s